Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 3 Next »

Feature Branch Exit Criteria

The following criteria must be met before considering landing the feature branch into master.

Exit Criteria

Status/Notes

Test automation and CI is 100% complete with “required for version”

No defects with high/critical exposure or “required for version”

No new daily or weekly regression test failures (failures not already on master branch)

  • Need to perform weekly regression test on feature branch

All tests are passing for feature in weekly and daily regression tests

  • Need to perform weekly regression test on feature branch

Performance and scale testing executed according to test plan/required requirements. Results are reviewed and approved

  • Need to perform performance testing

SDL Code scans are competed (Coverity, Bandit, Checkmarx, Snyk). For all scans, all issues have been dispositioned, and the issues that are required per SDL rules have been fixed.

  • Need to run coverity on feature branch.

SAFE review executed if required

Any new dependencies identified and Oked by ESAD OSPDT owner

Does not regress endurance testing from current master baseline with feature enabled

  • Perform SOAK testing

Does not regress scale testing from current master baseline with feature enabled

  • Create a ticket with relevant information (commit/branch to test and any special considerations) and assign to Dalton.

Manual test plans and “out-of-box experience” testing are 100% executed with “required for version”. Manual test results are recorded

Feature branch is up to date with master

  • Merge with master

Feature Completion Criteria

The following criteria must be met before considering the feature is complete

Exit Criteria

Status/Notes

Requirements are defined in SRS Jira Project

Design document is complete, reviewed, and approved utilizing the team template

Test plan for feature is complete, reviewed, and approved utilizing the team template. Security validate plan is also updated if applicable.

Planned software feature is 100% implemented with “required for version”

All user documentation updated and reviewed (e.g., admin guide, user guide)

Code coverage results have been reviewed to identify gaps in testing, and test plan has been updated and executed accordingly. Functional and branch coverage each are equivalent or better than master

Usability is evaluated and results are reviewed

  • No labels